Godot online – decisions of state and public institutions since 1 May 2026. Will the State's time for love come?read as an investigation with love❤️Expand ↓
148 responses of state love since 1 May 2026 · newest on top · the oldest response is No. 1. Will Godot finally arrive?
No.
Date
Authority
Ref./case no.
What happened
What the authority responded to
Objection / remedy
148
Office for Personal Data Protection
UOOU-06760/26-4
In order UOOU-06760/26-4 of 20 October 2026, the Office for Personal Data Protection expressly confirmed that the statutory time limit for the Minister of the Interior to decide the 12 August administrative appeal (Ganja For All Animals, z.s.) had expired without a decision. It nonetheless declined to order action against inactivity because the Minister issued decision MV-134798-4/SO-2026 on 7 October, ending that inactivity. No administrative appeal lies against this order. · PDF document
—
—
147
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
KRPT-276756-2/ČJ-2026-0700KR
On 20 October 2026 the Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate, ref. KRPT-276756-2/ČJ-2026-0700KR, informed the Educational Cannabis Clinic that it had received its information request on 15 October. It extended the deadline for providing information until 9 November 2026, citing consultations among police departments including the Olomouc Regional Police Directorate. This is an extended deadline, not a substantive response. · PDF document
15 October 2026 · Žádost o informace KŘP Olomouckého a Moravskoslezského kraje spojená s trestním podnětem · PDF document
—
146
European Union Drugs Agency
EXO/FHP/pd (26) D 110
EUDA responds to the fundamental objection: it recognises methodological limitations and uneven comparability of national THC potency data, clarifies that publishing national statistics does not validate forensic laboratories' analytical methods, declines to regard Regulation (EU) 2023/1322 as requiring an individually requested comparative study, and maintains its legal position of 25 September 2026. · PDF document
26 September 2026 · Fundamental objection to EUDA response of 25 September concerning comparability of THC data · PDF document
—
145
Office for Personal Data Protection
UOOU-05841/26-7; UOOU-05793/26; UOOU-05032/26
On 19 October 2026 the Office for Personal Data Protection confirmed that the appeal against the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office decision SIN 55/2026-19 is registered as UOOU-05841/26, was forwarded on 17 August, and is awaiting approval of a prepared decision. It expressly acknowledged exceeding the legal time limit. It separately confirmed that the complaint concerning the President's Office, UOOU-05793/26, was forwarded on 14 August and that its time limit too was exceeded. The Czech Television matter is registered separately under UOOU-05032/26; a further reply was promised. No final decision was issued by this letter. · PDF document
2 October 2026 · On 2 October 2026, Dušan Dvořák filed a complaint about inaction with the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection and requested immediate procedural action in three separate matters: the appeal filed on 1 August 2026 against the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office decision SIN 55/2026-19; the 10 August 2026 complaint under Section 16a of the Freedom of Information Act concerning Presidential Office ref. KPR 5772/2026-2; and the data-protection complaint concerning Czech Television, the Czech Television Council and the broadcasting regulator, originally submitted on 14 July 2026 and received by the authority on 15 July 2026. The filing also expressly points to 15 October 2026 as the three-month date calculated under Article 78(2) GDPR for the third branch. · PDF document
—
144
European Union Drugs Agency
Comparability of THC data - Access to documents request; bez samostatného č. j. v e-mailu
On 15 October 2026 at 11:25, EUDA asked the requester to confirm receipt of its 1 October email and stated that it expected to send the requested documents by the following day, before the applicable regulatory deadline. The message belongs to the separate access-to-documents procedure under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 concerning the comparability and methodological traceability of THC data. · PDF document
—
—
143
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3106/2026-235
On 15 October 2026 the Prostějov District Court, ref. 15 Nt 3106/2026-235, requested supporting financial documentation for the 1 October publicly funded defence application in renewal proceedings 2 T 65/2011. The 14-day response period runs from service, for which no verified date is available. This procedural request is not a rejection of the defence application. · PDF document
1 October 2026 · On 1 October 2026, Dušan Dvořák asked the Prostějov District Court to grant him free defence under Section 33(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to appoint defence counsel in both reopening proceedings, files 15 Nt 3104/2026 and 15 Nt 3106/2026. He relied on the Supreme Administrative Court order of 22 September 2026, ref. 6 As 207/2026-26, as recent evidence of his financial circumstances, proposed the appointment of Mgr. Miroslav Burget, and referred to the technical complexity of THC/THCA evidence before the public hearings scheduled for 12 and 13 October 2026. The filing does not itself restart the deadlines of the principal proceedings. · PDF document
—
142
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026-238
On 15 October 2026 the Prostějov District Court, ref. 15 Nt 3104/2026-238, requested additional evidence of income, bank accounts, property, debts and household circumstances to consider the 1 October application for publicly funded defence in renewal proceedings 2 T 104/2010. The requested documents are due within 14 days of the notice being served. No service date is established and the court did not yet decide eligibility. · PDF document
1 October 2026 · On 1 October 2026, Dušan Dvořák asked the Prostějov District Court to grant him free defence under Section 33(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to appoint defence counsel in both reopening proceedings, files 15 Nt 3104/2026 and 15 Nt 3106/2026. He relied on the Supreme Administrative Court order of 22 September 2026, ref. 6 As 207/2026-26, as recent evidence of his financial circumstances, proposed the appointment of Mgr. Miroslav Burget, and referred to the technical complexity of THC/THCA evidence before the public hearings scheduled for 12 and 13 October 2026. The filing does not itself restart the deadlines of the principal proceedings. · PDF document
—
141
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
SIN 72/2026-16
On 15 October 2026 the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, reference SIN 72/2026-16, asked the applicant to identify precisely which recorded information or documents he seeks specifically from that office under the Freedom of Information Act. It regarded the collective 14-page request involving five bodies and a criminal report as unclear. It stated that failure to clarify within 30 days of service of its notice would result in refusal of the request; the service date is not evidenced. · PDF document
10 October 2026 · Žádost o poskytnutí informací spojená pro NSZ a Policii ČR s trestním podnětem · PDF document
—
140
Czech Bar Association
10.32-000925/26-0002
On 15 October 2026, responding to the 10 October request, the Czech Bar Association's Brno branch provided instructions and a web link for formally seeking appointment of a lawyer for free legal assistance under the Advocates Act, including submission channels. This communication is not a decision granting or denying legal assistance. · PDF document
10 October 2026 · Naléhavá žádost o určení advokáta k bezplatné právní službě · PDF document
—
139
Prostějov District Court
St 7/2026; 15 Nt 3105/2026; 9 To 316/2026-219
In its letter dated 13 October 2026, reference St 7/2026, the Prostějov District Court dismissed as unfounded the complaint about delays in case 15 Nt 3105/2026. The court stated that the file returned from Brno Regional Court on 29 September and order 9 To 316/2026-219 was sent to the data box on 6 October and delivered on 7 October. The letter referred to the possibility of a motion to set a procedural time limit under Section 174a of Act No. 6/2002. The original higher-court order itself is not included here. · PDF document
—
—
138
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 VZN 266/2026-8
In notice 3 VZN 266/2026-8 of 12 October 2026, the Olomouc High Public Prosecutor's Office returned specified parts of the 6 October submission to the Brno Regional Public Prosecutor's Office for examination under 1 KZN 1090/2026, concerning Prostějov file ZN 4/2026. Brno was asked to assess new facts or potentially repetitive submissions. This forwarding did not itself amount to a new comprehensive merits review. · PDF document
6 October 2026 · Urgent joint evidentiary supplement dated 6 October 2026 addressed to the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Prague and Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Offices. It asks the authorities to assess together new prosecutorial notices concerning sampling, homogenisation, THC/THCA, decarboxylation, measurement uncertainty and laboratory methodology. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
—
137
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 VZN 265/2026-7
In notice 3 VZN 265/2026-7 of 12 October 2026, the Olomouc High Public Prosecutor's Office sent specified parts of the 6 October submission and attachments back to the Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor's Office in its file 4 KZN 3239/2026, concerning oversight of Frýdek-Místek proceedings 1 ZN 7061/2026. Ostrava is to assess any new facts or possible repetition; dismissal without further notification was flagged. This was a referral, not a new merits review of all objections. · PDF document
6 October 2026 · Urgent joint evidentiary supplement dated 6 October 2026 addressed to the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Prague and Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Offices. It asks the authorities to assess together new prosecutorial notices concerning sampling, homogenisation, THC/THCA, decarboxylation, measurement uncertainty and laboratory methodology. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
—
136
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026-209
On 12 October 2026, Prague Municipal Court rejected both the intervention and alternative inactivity actions against the Ministry of Justice, reference 18 A 23/2026-209. The court cited grounds including jurisdiction, timeliness, standing where submissions had been made by separate legal entities, and abuse of procedural rights. It ordered a refund of the CZK 2,000 court fee. A cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court is being prepared; no filing has yet been evidenced. · PDF document
6 October 2026 · A joint urgent evidentiary supplement dated 6 October 2026 for Prague Municipal Court cases 18 A 17/2026 and 18 A 23/2026. It expressly does not alter the defendants, factual core or relief sought and presents subsequent evidence concerning disputed forensic practices in analysing THC content in seized cannabis, THCA-to-THC conversion during heating and the possible legislative overlay of earlier practice. The public copy omits the claimant’s date of birth and private home address. · PDF document
—
135
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026-215
On 12 October 2026, Prague Municipal Court rejected the intervention action against the National Centre against Organised Crime and Police Presidium, reference 18 A 17/2026-215. The court relied, among other grounds, on the limits of administrative court jurisdiction over criminal investigations, lack of standing regarding submissions by separate legal persons, and abuse of procedural rights. It ordered the return of the CZK 2,000 court fee. A cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court is being prepared but has not been filed according to the available record. · PDF document
6 October 2026 · A joint urgent evidentiary supplement dated 6 October 2026 for Prague Municipal Court cases 18 A 17/2026 and 18 A 23/2026. It expressly does not alter the defendants, factual core or relief sought and presents subsequent evidence concerning disputed forensic practices in analysing THC content in seized cannabis, THCA-to-THC conversion during heating and the possible legislative overlay of earlier practice. The public copy omits the claimant’s date of birth and private home address. · PDF document
—
134
European Ombudsman
202602199
On 7 October 2026 the European Ombudsman confirmed receipt and registration of the complaint under reference 202602199. The office said it would contact the complainant again to state whether the complaint can be dealt with and, if so, what the next steps will be, usually within the following four weeks. It also stated that filing the complaint does not affect statutory time limits in related administrative or judicial proceedings. · PDF document
6 October 2026 · Complaint filed on 6 October 2026 by Cannabis is The Cure, z. s. through the European Ombudsman’s official complaint form, EOWEB_COMPLAINT_ID 59936. The complaint concerns EUDA’s handling, methodological comparability and transparent interpretation of European THC data, including THC/THCA definitions, sampling, homogenisation, drying, storage, analytical methods and measurement uncertainty. The published PDF is the byte-identical original supplied by the user. · PDF document
—
133
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
PPR-52605-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
On 7 October 2026, under ref. PPR-52605-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD, the Internal Control Office of the Police Presidium stated that the filing identified in the heading as dated 6 October 2026 would be placed on file without further measures insofar as it relied on the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s notice; the office said it was not competent to assess the procedure of an authority acting in criminal proceedings and could not presume the subsequent procedure of the police unit. The body of the notice contains “6 October 2024”, which conflicts with the heading’s “6 October 2026”; the public record preserves this source discrepancy rather than silently correcting it. · PDF document
—
8 October 2026 · Urgent evidentiary supplement dated 8 October 2026 addressed to the Office of the President, Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Justice, Police Presidium, Ministry of the Interior and Prostějov District Court. It frames a possible double legislative overlay of disputed forensic THC-analysis practices as an issue requiring evidence and invites the addressees to the reopening hearings on 30 November 2026. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
132
Ministry of the Interior
MV-134798-4/SO-2026
On 7 October 2026, under ref. MV-134798-4/SO-2026, the Minister of the Interior upheld the administrative appeal by Ganja For All Animals, z.s., annulled the Ministry’s decision of 11 August 2026, ref. MV-127234-2/OBP-2026, and remitted the matter for new consideration. The Minister agreed that the refusal was unreviewable because it did not explain how the requested information had been searched for, which units or records had been checked, or whether some information could be obtained by simple operations. In the new proceedings the Ministry must reassess the request and either provide the information in whole or in part, or issue a reviewable refusal. · PDF document
12 August 2026 · Ganja For All Animals, z.s. filed an administrative appeal against the Ministry of the Interior’s refusal; it alleges insufficient reviewability, failure to establish the cumulative conditions of Section 11b of the Freedom of Information Act and absence of documented searches · Evidence page
—
131
Prague Municipal Court
15 Ad 14/2026-17
On 7 October 2026, under ref. 15 Ad 14/2026-17, the Prague Municipal Court stated that case 15 Ad 14/2026 had been assigned under the work schedule to specialised panel 15 Ad and set out the procedure for raising an objection of bias under Section 8(5) of the Code of Administrative Justice. The service date is not established by the uploaded document. · PDF document
31 August 2026 · Intervention action concerning the State Institute for Drug Control · PDF document
—
130
Prague Municipal Court
15 Ad 14/2026-13
On 6 October 2026, under ref. 15 Ad 14/2026-13, the Prague Municipal Court rejected the intervention action against the State Institute for Drug Control. It held that the alleged conduct could not, by its nature, constitute an intervention under Section 82 of the Code of Administrative Justice. The order permits a cassation complaint within two weeks of service; the service date is not established by the uploaded document. · PDF document
31 August 2026 · Intervention action concerning the State Institute for Drug Control · PDF document
—
129
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026-191
The Prague Municipal Court stated that it would preserve the ten-day period for the claimant to respond to the defendant NCOZ statement, counted from the date that statement was served, and that it was prepared to decide after that period expired. · PDF document
1 October 2026 · On 1 October 2026, Dušan Dvořák filed a procedural statement in case 18 A 17/2026 responding to the court’s letter of 30 September 2026 and giving a preliminary reply to the NCOZ statement of 20 May 2026. He asked the court to preserve full adversarial procedure, allow access to the administrative file, provide time for a fuller reply and recorded that his motion under Section 174a seeking a decision still remained pending. · PDF document
4 October 2026 · The claimant’s document dated 4 October 2026 responds to court letter 18 A 17/2026-191, sends the narrowed claim and subsequent evidentiary supplements directly to NCOZ to preserve equality of arms, and copies the Prague Municipal Court; the filing expressly states that it does not change or expand the action. · PDF document
128
European Union Drugs Agency
no separate reference number in the email
EUDA acknowledged that it had received and registered a separate access-to-documents request under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, stated that processing had already begun as a procedure distinct from the call to act, including identifying requested documents that may be held by relevant EUDA services, and said it would respond within the time limits laid down in the applicable legislation. · PDF document
26 September 2026 · Fundamental objection to EUDA response of 25 September concerning comparability of THC data · PDF document
—
127
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 KZN 974/2026-114
The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office reviewed the handling by the Prague 2 District Public Prosecutor’s Office in case 1 ZN 157/2026 and dismissed Dušan Dvořák’s supervisory request of 1 August 2026 as unfounded. It concluded that the transferred part of the 27 May 2026 filing concerning the Ministry of Justice did not contain sufficiently concrete facts reasonably indicating an offence under Sections 329, 330 or another provision of the Criminal Code. The Office treated notice 3 KZN 974/2026-114 of 1 October 2026 as the final disposition of the matter and stated that further submissions with the same content would not be reviewed. · PDF document
1 August 2026 · Joint request for review of the Prague 2 prosecutor’s response · PDF document
8 October 2026 · Urgent evidentiary supplement dated 8 October 2026 addressed to the Office of the President, Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Justice, Police Presidium, Ministry of the Interior and Prostějov District Court. It frames a possible double legislative overlay of disputed forensic THC-analysis practices as an issue requiring evidence and invites the addressees to the reopening hearings on 30 November 2026. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document 6 October 2026 · Urgent joint evidentiary supplement dated 6 October 2026 addressed to the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Prague and Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Offices. It asks the authorities to assess together new prosecutorial notices concerning sampling, homogenisation, THC/THCA, decarboxylation, measurement uncertainty and laboratory methodology. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
126
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 SPR 338/2026-5
The Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office disposed of Dušan Dvořák’s complaint about delays. It stated that the review in case 1 KZT 475/2026 had been completed on 16 September 2026 and the notice dispatched on 18 September, but due to an administrative error it was not delivered to his data box until 29 September 2026; the Office apologised. In case 1 KZN 1079/2026 it stated that the review period had been extended to 9 October 2026 and expected written notification within that extended period. · PDF document
—
—
125
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 KZN 1079/2026-41
On 1 October 2026, under ref. 1 KZN 1079/2026-41, the Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed as unfounded the request for supervisory review of the Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office handling of case 3 ZN 140/2026. It nevertheless acknowledged a procedural error in directly returning the relevant part of the filing to the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office, while treating that error as immaterial to the substantive disposition; it considered that Prague itself should have dealt with that part under Section 16a(4), second sentence. · PDF document
13 September 2026 · A filing dated 13 September 2026 supplemented Brno Regional Court complaint proceedings 9 To 315/2026 and 9 To 316/2026 and related supervision/review branches before the Olomouc High and Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Offices. · PDF document 3 September 2026 · Joint evidentiary supplement to complaints concerning reopening of proceedings · PDF document 24 August 2026 · Joint complaint supplement and evidence on THC testing · PDF document 27 July 2026 · Request to review the Brno prosecutor’s return of the matter without a substantive decision · PDF document
8 October 2026 · Urgent evidentiary supplement dated 8 October 2026 addressed to the Office of the President, Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Justice, Police Presidium, Ministry of the Interior and Prostějov District Court. It frames a possible double legislative overlay of disputed forensic THC-analysis practices as an issue requiring evidence and invites the addressees to the reopening hearings on 30 November 2026. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
124
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026-186
On 30 September 2026, the Prague Municipal Court, ref. 18 A 17/2026-186, sent Dušan Dvořák the defendant NCOZ statement dated 20 May 2026 for information and stated that the defendant had also submitted the administrative file. The NCOZ statement is retained as a separate canonical attachment but is displayed on the same public chronology row as this court letter because this was the act by which it was transmitted to the claimant. · PDF document
—
1 October 2026 · On 1 October 2026, Dušan Dvořák filed a procedural statement in case 18 A 17/2026 responding to the court’s letter of 30 September 2026 and giving a preliminary reply to the NCOZ statement of 20 May 2026. He asked the court to preserve full adversarial procedure, allow access to the administrative file, provide time for a fuller reply and recorded that his motion under Section 174a seeking a decision still remained pending. · PDF document
123
Office of the President of the Republic
KPR 5080/2026
The Office of the President acknowledged two further submissions received on 22 September 2026. It stated that neither the President nor any representative of the Office would attend the public hearings on the reopening applications at Prostějov District Court on 12 and 13 October 2026. Referring to its letter of 2 September 2026, it said that the President would reconsider the repeated pardon request only after a longer interval and, above all, if new material facts relevant to revising his previous refusals emerged. No date for reconsideration could be specified in advance; the applicant would be notified promptly when a decision was made. The letter itself does not grant a pardon or announce a new decision on its merits. · PDF document
21 September 2026 · Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions · PDF document
—
122
European Ombudsman
e-mail 28/09/2026
On 28 September 2026, the European Ombudsman’s Secretariat stated that the email sent on 27 September would not be processed as a complaint unless the official complaint form was used. It also said that prior correspondence with the relevant EU body should be attached. The message did not substantively reject the concerns raised about EUDA. · Evidence page
27 September 2026 · Complaint to the European Ombudsman concerning EUDA’s oversight of THC data (English version) · PDF document
6 October 2026 · Complaint filed on 6 October 2026 by Cannabis is The Cure, z. s. through the European Ombudsman’s official complaint form, EOWEB_COMPLAINT_ID 59936. The complaint concerns EUDA’s handling, methodological comparability and transparent interpretation of European THC data, including THC/THCA definitions, sampling, homogenisation, drying, storage, analytical methods and measurement uncertainty. The published PDF is the byte-identical original supplied by the user. · PDF document
121
European Union Drugs Agency
EXO/FHP/pd (26) D 106
EUDA responded substantively to the formal call to act under Article 265 TFEU. The Agency stated that, in its view, Articles 6(1)(f) and 15 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1322 do not impose a specific, unconditional and legally binding obligation to carry out the requested comparative assessment or harmonisation work. At the same time, EUDA acknowledged that differences in analytical methods, the treatment of THC and THCA, sample preparation and storage, and approaches to measurement uncertainty may affect analytical outcomes and comparability. It also stated that it does not maintain a systematic inventory of national THC determination methodologies, has not carried out a systematic comparative assessment of those methodologies, and has not decided to conduct or commission such work. · PDF document
7 August 2026 · The English formal call asked EUDA to perform its own tasks under Regulation (EU) 2023/1322 concerning scientific quality, comparability and harmonisation of analytical methods; it did not ask EUDA to interfere with the jurisdiction of Czech courts · PDF document
—
120
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026-182
On 23 September 2026, under ref. 18 A 23/2026-182, the Prague Municipal Court sent the claimant, for information, the defendant Ministry of Justice's statement concerning the action, dated 27 August 2026. The Court set a one-week period from service of the covering letter for any reply. It also stated that it treats the case as a priority matter, but not as an extraordinarily urgent one. The uploaded PDF contains the Court's covering letter only, not the defendant's attached statement. Because the date of service is not evidenced in the document, no specific calendar deadline is inferred. · PDF document
—
—
119
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026-182
On 23 September 2026, under ref. 18 A 17/2026-182, the Prague Municipal Court stated that it had received the claimant's motion to set a time limit for a procedural act. Independently of the motion dated 21 September 2026, the Court said it had planned and still planned to decide case 18 A 17/2026 in the coming weeks, within the thirty-day framework referred to in Section 174a(3) of Act No. 6/2002. It therefore was not at that point forwarding the case file to the Supreme Administrative Court. No specific calendar decision date is inferred from the document. · PDF document
—
—
118
Supreme Administrative Court
6 As 207/2026-26
Information on cassation proceedings 6 As 207/2026. · Evidence page
—
—
117
Prague Municipal Court
15 Ad 14/2026-12
On 22 September 2026, under ref. 15 Ad 14/2026-12, the Prague Municipal Court stated that the court fee paid in proceeding 8 Ad 9/2026 cannot be transferred to the separate fee obligation in proceeding 15 Ad 14/2026. The Court also stated that an instruction to refund the fee paid in 8 Ad 9/2026 had already been issued. The communication does not terminate proceeding 15 Ad 14/2026 and sets no new deadline. · PDF document
—
—
116
Prague 4 District Court
10 C 69/2026
On 16 September 2026, in case 10 C 69/2026 (Mgr. Dušan Dvořák v Czech Television, protection of personality), the Prague 4 District Court summoned the claimant to the first hearing, scheduled for 24 November 2026 at 13:00 in courtroom 3.308. The document fixes a concrete hearing date; it does not decide the merits of the case. The previous elapsed-time timer for waiting on the next procedural step is therefore removed, while the court case itself remains active. · PDF document
—
—
115
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 KZT 475/2026-71
The Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the request for supervision of the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office as unfounded. It stated that a prosecutor need not provide an opinion on reopening before the public hearing and that legal advice on cannabis cultivation falls outside the prosecution service’s remit. It nevertheless accepted that future submissions cannot be rejected indiscriminately, limiting that approach to repeated submissions containing no new facts. The notice addresses the filing of 10 July 2026 and supplements through 13 September 2026. · PDF document
13 September 2026 · A filing dated 13 September 2026 supplemented Brno Regional Court complaint proceedings 9 To 315/2026 and 9 To 316/2026 and related supervision/review branches before the Olomouc High and Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Offices. · PDF document 26 July 2026 · Supplement to the review of the Prostějov prosecutor and 2026 preventive cooperation · PDF document 10 July 2026 · Request to review the handling by the Prostějov prosecutor · PDF document
8 October 2026 · Urgent evidentiary supplement dated 8 October 2026 addressed to the Office of the President, Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Justice, Police Presidium, Ministry of the Interior and Prostějov District Court. It frames a possible double legislative overlay of disputed forensic THC-analysis practices as an issue requiring evidence and invites the addressees to the reopening hearings on 30 November 2026. It is a Justice Slalom filing and may also appear only as a related filing in Godot. · PDF document
114
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 VZN 239/2026-64
On 15 September 2026 the Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office explained how it handled submissions dated 15 and 24 August and 2, 3 and 13 September. It noted or had forwarded several filings and stated that supervision over district public prosecutor’s offices belongs to the directly superior regional offices; the 13 September filing was therefore noted without further measure at the High Office. · Evidence page
13 September 2026 · A filing dated 13 September 2026 supplemented Brno Regional Court complaint proceedings 9 To 315/2026 and 9 To 316/2026 and related supervision/review branches before the Olomouc High and Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Offices. · PDF document
—
113
Prague High Court
3 Cmo 24/2026-26
The Prague High Court quashed the Prague Municipal Court’s order of 4 March 2026, reference 3 Cm 2/2026-19, refusing the Educational Cannabis Clinic’s applications for court-fee exemption and appointed counsel. It held that district courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over the claim for a reply against FTV Prima and ordered transfer to Prague 10 District Court once the order becomes final. It classified the claim as a statutory right of reply under broadcasting legislation. The order did not decide whether FTV Prima must publish the reply. · PDF document
—
2 October 2026 · Educational Cannabis Clinic supplemented and clarified its action against FTV Prima after the Prague High Court order 3 Cmo 24/2026-26 and asked the Prague 10 District Court to communicate the new case number once the file is registered there. · PDF document
112
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3106/2026
On 14 September 2026, under ref. 15 Nt 3106/2026, the Prostějov District Court informed Dušan Dvořák that this file will be used to hear the application to reopen proceedings previously conducted under file 2 T 65/2011. The Court also stated that, in the original case, the public prosecutor withdrew the indictment and the criminal proceedings were subsequently discontinued. The letter is a procedural clarification; it does not itself grant reopening, decide the merits, create a new remedy or start a separate new timer. · PDF document
—
—
111
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026
On 14 September 2026, under ref. 15 Nt 3104/2026, the Prostějov District Court informed Dušan Dvořák that this file will be used to hear his application to reopen the proceedings previously conducted under file 2 T 104/2010. The letter is a procedural clarification identifying the reopening case; it does not itself grant reopening, decide the merits, create a new remedy or start a separate new timer. · PDF document
—
2 October 2026 · On 2 October 2026, the Educational Cannabis Clinic filed a procedural and evidentiary submission with the Prostějov District Court for both reopening proceedings 15 Nt 3104/2026 (2 T 104/2010) and 15 Nt 3106/2026 (2 T 65/2011). It asks the court to address the procedural standing of affected legal entities, to recognise the Clinic as a common representative where the statutory conditions are met, and alternatively to admit the filing and the updated evidence chronology as documentary evidence before the public hearings of 12 and 13 October 2026. · PDF document
110
Ministry of the Interior
MV-139593-3/TP-2026
On 14 September 2026 the Ministry of the Interior dismissed the appeal dated 24 August 2026 and confirmed the Moravian-Silesian Regional Police decision of 20 August 2026, ref. KRPT-203594-8/ČJ-2026-0700KR, concerning partial refusal of an information request. The decision states that no further administrative appeal is available. · Evidence page
—
—
109
Prague Municipal Court
9 Ad 12/2026-7
On 14 September 2026 the Prague Municipal Court rejected the second identical intervention action in case 9 Ad 12/2026 because an earlier identical action filed on 31 August 2026 remains pending as 15 Ad 14/2026. The rejection of 9 Ad 12/2026 therefore does not terminate the earlier 15 Ad 14/2026 proceeding. The order allows a cassation complaint within two weeks of service; the service date is not recorded here. · Evidence page
—
—
108
Prague Municipal Court
8 Ad 9/2026-89
On 9 September 2026, under ref. 8 Ad 9/2026-89, the Prague Municipal Court asked the claimant to provide a bank account number so that the court fee could be refunded pursuant to operative part III of the order of 28 August 2026, ref. 8 Ad 9/2026-85. The letter is an administrative follow-up implementing the already ordered refund; it does not itself decide the merits of the intervention action or record a new remedy. · PDF document
—
—
107
Ministry of Justice
MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/27
The Minister of Justice treated the submissions delivered on 12 July, 15 July, 10 August and 25 August 2026 as a request for measures against inactivity under Section 80(2) of the Administrative Procedure Code. He found the request unfounded, declined to take an inactivity measure and stated that the filing of 12 July 2026 was disposed of by this letter. He also stated that a settlement cannot be concluded in the administrative action and that further filings without new material facts may be placed on file without further written notice. · PDF document
10 August 2026 · A joint complaint in two matters alleged failure to deal with the request of 12 July and continuing inactivity after the complaint of 15 July; it was also submitted to the Prague Municipal Court as a separate evidentiary annex concerning urgency · PDF document
—
106
General Inspection of Security Forces
GI-3794-4/ČJ-2026-840502-P
The General Inspection of Security Forces stated on 8 September 2026, under ref. GI-3794-4/ČJ-2026-840502-P, that the filings delivered on 15 and 24 August 2026 concerning review of 2009-2019 proceedings and internal review of police procedures for determining THC in cannabis had been forwarded, according to subject-matter and territorial competence, to the Police Presidium of the Czech Republic for further measures. The Inspection also stated that it lacked authority to assess the challenged Police procedures or the factual and legal questions concerning evidence, and expressly treated the matter as disposed of on its side. · PDF document
15 August 2026 · A filing asked the General Inspection of Security Forces to examine specified factual hypotheses concerning THC laboratory records and preserve the underlying documentation; it expressly did not claim that a particular person had committed an offence · PDF document
—
105
Supreme Administrative Court
6 As 207/2026-13; navazuje na 15 A 44/2026-43
The Supreme Administrative Court confirmed receipt on 2 September 2026 of the cassation complaint against Prague Municipal Court order 15 A 44/2026-43 and requested a completed statement of personal, property and income circumstances within one week of service so it can decide the requests for exemption from court fees and appointment of counsel · Evidence page
—
—
104
Frýdek-Místek District Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 ZN 7061/2026-79
The Frýdek-Místek District Public Prosecutor’s Office closed the filings without further action and advised that the handling may be reviewed by the Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office under Section 16a(7) · PDF document
2 September 2026 · Urgent supplement to the filing before the Frýdek-Místek District Public Prosecutor’s Office concerning the new Institute of Criminalistics versus Police Presidium internal-control procedural fact; the supplement expressly does not restart the running period · PDF document
—
103
Brno Regional Court
9 To 315/2026-140
The Brno Regional Court dismissed the complaint in case 9 To 315/2026 under Section 148(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code as lodged by a person not entitled to bring it, without a substantive review of the asserted new evidence. · PDF document
11 August 2026 · Complaint against the Prostějov District Court order of 7 August 2026, ref. 15 Nt 3103/2026-53 · PDF document
—
102
Office of the President of the Republic
KPR 5080/2026
The Head of the Office of the President dealt with the complaint concerning the Office’s procedure and stated that later submissions recorded under KPR 5080/2026 had not yet been decided · PDF document
3 August 2026 · A complaint under Section 175 of the Code of Administrative Procedure challenged the accuracy, completeness and reviewability of the Office’s administrative handling of communication KPR 5080/2026 and requested investigation and remedial measures · PDF document
—
101
Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting
RRTV/8853/2026-bur; sp. zn. RRTV/2026/560/kar
On 1 September 2026, the Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting, under ref. RRTV/8853/2026-bur and case file RRTV/2026/560/kar, shelved the filing concerning Czech Television’s reporting on cannabis without opening misdemeanor proceedings. The Council found that the filing referred to an unspecified part of Czech Television’s programming and contained no facts actionable within its supervisory competence. Its notice states that no court action may be filed against the decision under Section 66 of Act No. 231/2001. · PDF document
—
—
100
Ministry of Health
MZDR 21970/2026-3/MIN/KAN
The Czech Ministry of Health answered ten freedom-of-information questions submitted by Ganja For All Animals, z.s. about the collection, storage and transport of blood samples, blood and blood components. It cited the applicable legislation, the ČSN EN ISO 15189:2023 standard and professional guidance, and described storage temperatures, validation of transport boxes and vehicles, and transport monitoring. At the same time, the Ministry stated that it held neither the requested record and protocol templates nor inspection findings, methodological positions or records of temperature or time deviations since 1 January 2021, and refused those parts of the request. It identified the State Institute for Drug Control as the supervisory authority for blood banks, blood establishments and healthcare providers. · PDF document
—
—
99
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 KZN 974/2026-108
The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office re-examined the relevant part of Dušan Dvořák's filing of 27 May 2026 and follow-up filings of 14, 15 and 19 July 2026 after the Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office returned the transferred part under reference 3 ZN 140/2026-3. The Prague office concluded that the filings, insofar as they concerned persons serving or formerly serving at the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, did not contain concrete facts reasonably indicating an offence under Sections 329, 330 or another provision of the Criminal Code. It therefore filed the submissions without further action under Section 16a of the Public Prosecutor's Office Act and treated them as disposed of. The notice expressly states that the manner of disposal may be submitted for review under Section 16a(7) to the Prague High Public Prosecutor's Office. · PDF document
—
—
98
Ministry of Culture
MK 53559/2026 SOCNS
The Czech Ministry of Culture answered questions raised in submissions of 26 June and 7 July 2026 and later supplements concerning the procedural status and registration of the Cannabis Church. It confirmed that the original registration proceeding had been finally concluded by the 2019 refusal, that the preparatory committee and its representative were and remain recorded as parties, and referred to the parallel order MK 53547/2026 SOCNS. The Ministry stated that it lacked competence to assess THC/THCA forensic methodology, the European Commission position or Danish materials, and treated the EU-law and preliminary-reference issues as irrelevant to the registration proceeding. It also stated that it had assessed the submissions according to their substance, good-administration principles, religious neutrality and protection of religious pluralism, and offered a possible personal meeting on further merits-related questions. · PDF document
—
—
97
Ministry of Culture
MK 53547/2026 SOCNS
The Czech Ministry of Culture discontinued the proceeding on the preparatory committee’s request for a new proceeding and a new decision concerning registration of the Cannabis Church under Section 101(b) of the Administrative Procedure Code. It accepted that the original registration request had been finally refused, but concluded that the new legal, factual, evidentiary and doctrinal circumstances did not justify a favourable new decision. The Ministry treated changes in cannabis law, THC/THCA forensic issues, EU-law arguments and the legal regime of cannabis religious objects as irrelevant to registration, regarded the more detailed explanation of the Church’s teaching as not constituting a new fact, and again concluded that the Cannabis Church did not satisfy the statutory definition of a church and religious society. A remonstrance may be filed within 15 days of service; it has no suspensive effect. · PDF document
—
1 September 2026 · Administrative appeal against termination of the Church of Cannabis registration proceedings · PDF document
96
Prague Municipal Court
8 Ad 9/2026-85
The Prague Municipal Court rejected the intervention action against the Ministry of Health under Section 46(1)(a) of the Code of Administrative Justice, finding that the challenged classification of medicinal cannabis as a ‘highly addictive substance’ was not an individualised intervention against the claimant but part of the general statutory and regulatory framework. No party was awarded costs. After the order becomes final, the claimant is to receive a refund of the full CZK 2,000 court fee because the action was rejected before the first hearing; the Court requested bank details within 10 days. A cassation complaint may be filed within two weeks of service. · PDF document
—
—
95
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 KZN 974/2026-103
The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office completed supervisory review of the Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office in file ZN 87/2026. The review concerned the part of the submission relating to officials of the Ministry of the Interior. The Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office concluded that the materials did not sufficiently particularise facts indicating an offence under Sections 329 or 330 of the Criminal Code or another criminal offence, dismissed the supervisory submission as unfounded and stated that the matter was finally disposed of at that level. It also advised that further submissions of identical content would no longer be reviewed or acknowledged. · PDF document
—
—
94
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 KZN 974/2026-100
The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office completed supervisory review of the Prague 4 District Public Prosecutor’s Office in file 1 ZN 320/2026. It found no error requiring corrective action, dismissed the supervisory submission as unfounded and stated that the matter was finally disposed of at that level. It also advised that further submissions of identical content would no longer be reviewed or acknowledged. · PDF document
—
—
93
Ministry of Justice
MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/26
On 27 August 2026, under ref. MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/26 in case 18 A 23/2026, the Ministry of Justice submitted its statement on the intervention action and related case material. The Ministry argues that the claimant lacks standing and that no intervention within the meaning of Section 82 of the Code of Administrative Justice occurred; it proposes dismissal of the action as inadmissible and, alternatively, rejection on the merits. This is the defendant authority's litigation position, not a court determination of the merits. · PDF document
—
—
92
Office for Personal Data Protection
UOOU-05841/26-3
The Czech Office for Personal Data Protection stated that the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office sent the appeal and the case file on 12 August 2026, but they were not received by the Office until 17 August 2026. According to the Office, the fifteen-day period under Section 16(3) of the Freedom of Information Act therefore runs from that delivery and expires on 1 September 2026. The Office also stated that no procedural act had yet been taken in the appeal proceedings and that the separate submission of 14 July 2026, supplemented on 12 August 2026, would be handled by the competent department in a separate letter. · PDF document
—
—
91
National Institute of Public Health
SZU/10724/2026
The National Institute of Public Health issued a decision partially refusing the information request under Section 11b of the Czech Freedom of Information Act. It refused information concerning methodologies, temperature ranges, transport without a validated box, high-temperature transport conditions, temperature monitoring and generally applicable validation requirements, stating that these matters fall within the competence of the healthcare providers sending samples. The decision may be appealed within 15 days to the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection through the Institute. · PDF document
—
—
90
Ostrava Regional Court
St 82/2026; souvisí s 15 T 11/2025
The Ostrava Regional Court confirmed that on 24 August 2026 it received a complaint concerning the conduct of proceedings before the Ostrava District Court in case 15 T 11/2025. Because the chair of the Ostrava District Court is competent to deal with the complaint, the Regional Court forwarded it to her on 26 August 2026. · PDF document
—
—
89
National Institute of Public Health
SZU/10724/2026
The National Institute of Public Health responded to the information request concerning transport, storage and handover of human blood samples. It stated that pre-analytical handling and transport are the responsibility of the healthcare provider sending the sample, referred to its laboratory sampling manual, and stated that since 1 January 2021 it has recorded no degradation, refusal or challenge of a blood sample because of transport conditions. · PDF document
—
—
88
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3106/2026
Prostějov District Court summons to a public hearing on 13 October 2026. · PDF document
—
—
87
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3106/2026
Prostějov District Court statement that cases 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 cannot be joined in one proceeding. · PDF document
—
—
86
Prague Municipal Court
15 A 44/2026-43
Prague Municipal Court ruling rejecting the intervention action against the Interior Ministry in case 15 A 44/2026. · PDF document
—
—
85
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
PPR-44020-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
The Internal Control Office of the Police Presidium declined superior review under Section 97(3) of the Police Act on the ground that the preceding mandatory examination under Section 97 had not taken place at the Institute of Criminalistics, and placed the filing of 15 August 2026 on file without further action. · PDF document
—
—
84
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
2 KZN 683/2026-31
Prague Municipal Prosecutor response returning a submission for further handling. · PDF document
—
—
83
Institute of Criminalistics of the Police of the Czech Republic
KU-4139-12/ČJ-2026-2305KM
The Institute of Criminalistics stated that it was unaware of any error in forensic work, that the quality of forensic work is monitored through methodological and expert visits, and that it was not obliged, at the applicant’s request, to review forensic procedures and methods used in expert work. · PDF document
—
—
82
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Annex to KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR; příloha č. 1 k RŘ KÚ č. 54/2021
Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: methodology for taking a representative sample of plant material, Annex 1 to Director’s Order No. 54/2021. · PDF document
—
—
81
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Annex to KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR; RŘ KÚ č. 54/2021; KU-8331-1/ČJ-2021-2305KM
Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: Director of the Institute of Criminalistics Order No. 54/2021 on the examination of cannabis and cannabinoids. · PDF document
—
—
80
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Annex to KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR
Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: list of files concerning methodological and expert visits, inter-laboratory tests and destruction records from 2009–2019. · PDF document
—
—
79
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
KRPT-203594-8/ČJ-2026-0700KR
Decision partially refusing the freedom-of-information request: the Police stated that in 2009–2019 the Frýdek-Místek forensic unit had no SOPs for determining THC, no written methodological instructions for homogenisation or determination of THC/THCA, no methodology for measurement uncertainty and no validation protocols; some control files had been destroyed after retention periods expired. · PDF document
—
—
78
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR
The Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate partially answered the freedom-of-information request concerning SOPs and methodological documentation used by the Frýdek-Místek forensic unit in 2009–2019, providing a representative-sampling methodology and a list of methodological visits and destruction records. · PDF document
—
—
77
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
2 KZN 55/2025-136
The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office dealt with filings dated 25 April, 10, 12 and 27 May, 2 and 4 June, and 15 and 19 July 2026; it found no reason to exercise the power under Section 157(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and placed the specified filings on file without further action. · PDF document
—
—
76
Prague Municipal Court
8 Ad 9/2026-80
The Prague Municipal Court forwarded to the claimant, for information, the Ministry of Health’s statement of defence and its supplement in the intervention action. · Evidence page
—
20 August 2026 · The claimant filed a reply to the Ministry of Health’s statement and supplement, requesting urgent determination without requesting a public hearing. · PDF document
75
Olomouc University Hospital
příloha poskytnutá dne 19. 8. 2026; STL2015_11 ze dne 2. 11. 2015
Olomouc University Hospital provided, in response to the request concerning transport of blood, recommendation STL2015_11 on storage and transport of blood, blood components, starting material for further manufacture and blood products. · Evidence page
—
—
74
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026-56; souvisí s 2 T 104/2010
The Prostějov District Court summoned Dušan Dvořák to a public hearing on the application to reopen proceedings on 12 October 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 17 and stated that his attendance was required. It also stated that cases 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 could not be joined because they had ended at different procedural stages · PDF document
—
—
73
Ministry of Transport
MD-46042/2026-010/4; sp. zn. MD/46042/2026/010
The Ministry of Transport deferred the freedom-of-information request concerning the collection, transport and storage of blood samples. It stated that it holds no documents concerning those matters and has never held any, considered the requested information outside its remit, and referred the applicant to the Police of the Czech Republic, the Police Presidium, the Ministry of the Interior or the Ministry of Health. · PDF document
—
—
72
Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
SIN 233/2026-9
The Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the appeal and upheld the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office decision refusing information about the receipt, registration and transfer of filings. It described the contested decision as being at the very edge of reviewability, supplied an expanded rationale of its own and concluded that the request constituted an abuse of rights. The decision is dated 17 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026 · PDF document
—
—
71
State Institute for Drug Control
sukl252539/2026; sp. zn. sukls242547/2026
The State Institute for Drug Control referred questions 2–7 to the blood decree and the Good Practice Guidelines for Blood Establishments; it stated that it has no specialised inspection methodology and records no requested inspection findings or measures since 1 January 2021 · PDF document
—
—
70
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
PPR-42608-3/ČJ-2026-990810
The Police Presidium provided information on the receipt, custody, transport and handover of venous blood samples; it stated that its internal instruments do not regulate the requested chain-of-custody details or a maximum transport time and that since 1 January 2021 it has issued no methodology on defects in sample transport or handover · PDF document
—
—
69
Olomouc Region Public Health Authority
KHSOC/33066/2026/SPR; sp. zn. KHSOC/31529/2026
The Olomouc Region Public Health Authority provided information on hygiene requirements for transporting biological material; it stated that it does not inspect the temperature regime because it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, has no specific methodology for the listed non-conformities and has conducted no such inspection since 1 January 2021 · PDF document
—
—
68
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
PPR-43826-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
The Police Presidium’s Internal Control Office declared that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the complaint concerning inactivity by the Institute of Criminalistics and transferred it to the office of the Institute’s director · Evidence page
14 August 2026 · Complaint concerning the Police’s handling of point 3 of the filing dated 27 May 2026 and request to re-examine the internal expert and control review of THC measurement · PDF document
15 August 2026 · A request under Section 97 of the Police Act sought a superior and impartial review of how the Institute of Criminalistics dealt with the filing · PDF document 15 August 2026 · A sixth supplement to the pre-action demand in file 6 NZN 1737/2026 requested a single independent, reviewable resolution of the connected branches · PDF document 15 August 2026 · A filing asked the General Inspection of Security Forces to examine specified factual hypotheses concerning THC laboratory records and preserve the underlying documentation; it expressly did not claim that a particular person had committed an offence · PDF document 15 August 2026 · An evidentiary supplement in case 15 A 44/2026 submitted the Police Presidium communication as a new record without changing the action, grounds or relief sought · PDF document 15 August 2026 · A supplement submitted the Police Presidium communication of 14 August as a new record and requested managerial and control measures from the Minister of the Interior · PDF document 15 August 2026 · A supplement asked the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office to assess the new Police Presidium record in the pending review of the Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office · PDF document 15 August 2026 · A joint filing asked the Prague and Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Offices to supplement and coordinate their supervisory review · PDF document
67
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026-73
The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office stated that the requests concerning the Ministry of Justice, the court proceedings and the settlement proposal fell outside its remit, and transferred the part seeking review of the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office to the Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office. The record is dated 13 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026 · PDF document
—
—
66
Ministry of Culture
MK 49467/2026 SOCNS
The Ministry of Culture formally confirmed that the proceeding for a new proceeding and decision under Section 101(b) of the Code of Administrative Procedure had commenced on 26 June 2026 · Evidence page
—
—
65
Office of the President of the Republic
4873/2026
The Office declined to assist with the proposal to fly a cannabis standard above Prague Castle, referring generally to the number of requests and its limited capacity to accommodate them · PDF document
—
—
64
Ministry of the Interior
MV-127234-2/OBP-2026
The Ministry of the Interior refused Ganja For All Animals, z.s.’s request under Section 11b of the Freedom of Information Act, stating that it held none of the requested information · Evidence page
—
12 August 2026 · Ganja For All Animals, z.s. filed an administrative appeal against the Ministry of the Interior’s refusal; it alleges insufficient reviewability, failure to establish the cumulative conditions of Section 11b of the Freedom of Information Act and absence of documented searches · Evidence page
63
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026-131
Request to state whether the claimant agrees to determination without a hearing under Section 51(1) of the Code of Administrative Justice · PDF document
—
19 August 2026 · An exceptionally urgent supplement to the action submitted further documentary evidence concerning the alleged continuing arbitrariness, reversal of institutional responsibility and continuation of the challenged interference. · PDF document 10 August 2026 · The claimant agreed to determination without a hearing, reported payment of the court fee and submitted new evidence of the continuing intervention and urgency without changing the relief sought · PDF document
62
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026-130
Order to pay a court fee of CZK 2,000 within 15 days in the intervention action against the Ministry of Justice · PDF document
—
—
61
European Union Drugs Agency
no separate reference number in the email
Acknowledgement of receipt of the formal call to act under Article 265 TFEU and an indication that a further response would follow · Evidence page
7 August 2026 · The English formal call asked EUDA to perform its own tasks under Regulation (EU) 2023/1322 concerning scientific quality, comparability and harmonisation of analytical methods; it did not ask EUDA to interfere with the jurisdiction of Czech courts · PDF document
15 August 2026 · A letter to CannaReporter.eu Editor-in-Chief Laura Ramos described a parallel between the Paulo Santos case and Czech disputes over the comparability of THC measurements, and informed her of the formal call to EUDA · PDF document
60
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3105/2026-54
The Court rejected as inadmissible under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure an application to reopen proceedings concerning forfeiture of property · PDF document
—
10 August 2026 · A supplement to the timely complaint alleged in particular that the full scope of the joint reopening application had not been decided and requested that the order be set aside and the matter reheard · PDF document
59
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3103/2026-53
Under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court rejected the application to reopen two proceedings concluded by orders ref. 2 Nt 1151/2014-80 and 3 Nt 1151/2014-411, in which protective measures in the form of forfeiture of property had been imposed · Evidence page
—
11 August 2026 · Complaint against the Prostějov District Court order of 7 August 2026, ref. 15 Nt 3103/2026-53 · PDF document
58
Office of the President of the Republic
KPR 5772/2026-2
Following the complaint, the Office reconsidered the supplemented request, supplied further information and described the result as full relief through internal reconsideration · PDF document
—
10 August 2026 · A repeated complaint alleged that the Office had not granted full relief, had narrowed the subject of the earlier complaint and had dealt incompletely with records of related filings · PDF document
57
Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
KRPT-203594-3/ČJ-2026-0700KR
Extension of the time limit for the freedom-of-information request · PDF document
—
—
56
Office of the President of the Republic
KPR 5080/2026
Statement concerning the supporting materials in the pardon and amnesty matter · PDF document
—
15 August 2026 · A consolidated report submitted developments through 15 August in support of the request for an individual pardon and broader humanitarian consideration of cannabis cases; it did not present the new records as automatic proof that every earlier conviction was unlawful · PDF document 3 August 2026 · A complaint under Section 175 of the Code of Administrative Procedure challenged the accuracy, completeness and reviewability of the Office’s administrative handling of communication KPR 5080/2026 and requested investigation and remedial measures · PDF document
55
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 KZN 1079/2026-14
Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for review · PDF document
—
—
54
Prague 2 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 ZN 157/2026-33
Notice of the result of the examination · PDF document
—
—
53
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
SIN 55/2026-19
Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request · PDF document
—
1 August 2026 · Appeal against the NSZ decision on an information request · PDF document
52
Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
SIN 48/2026-12
Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request · PDF document
—
31 July 2026 · Appeal against refusal of an information request · PDF document
51
Office of the President of the Republic
KPR 5772/2026-1
Communication concerning the pardon and cannabis-amnesty procedure · PDF document
—
—
50
Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
4 KZN 7116/2026-50
Transfer of the supplement to the filing · PDF document
—
—
49
Office for Personal Data Protection
UOOU-05093/26-2
Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated · PDF document
—
—
48
Office for Personal Data Protection
UOOU-05058/26-2
Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated · PDF document
15 August 2026 · The filing informed the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office of the subsequent steps taken by the Institute of Criminalistics and the Police Presidium’s Internal Control Office, and requested cooperation, clear procedural guidance and information on the status of the preventive filing · PDF document
46
Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
ZN 87/2026-47
Notice of the result of the examination · PDF document
—
—
45
Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 VZN 1678/2026-70
Notice of the result of supervisory review · PDF document
The complaint was dealt with through internal reconsideration · PDF document
—
—
13
Czech Television
CT 338889/2025-38
Rejection of the settlement proposal · PDF document
—
15 August 2026 · A complaint to the Director-General of Czech Television and the Chair of the Czech Television Council requested substantive consideration of the submitted records, a response and an attempt at settlement; the filing expressly stated that it was not a complaint under Section 175 of the Code of Administrative Procedure · PDF document
Chamber of Deputies – MVDr. Ing. Václav Trojan, Ph.D.
Access to medical cannabis and a shift away from its criminalisation, head of the MU/FNUSA cannabis cultivation facilityCopy
Information request and criminal complaint concerning THC/THCA methodology and forensic practice Original PDF
227
Ministry of Justice
18 A 23/2026; MSP-674/2024-ODKA-SPZ; MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ; MSP-162/2026-ODKA-SPZ
Information request concerning decisions and the methodology for determining THC Original PDF
226
Ministry of the Interior
15 A 44/2026; MV-108890-3/TP-2026; MV-97289/TP-2026; MV-114818/TP-2026
Information request concerning decisions and the methodology for determining THC Original PDF
225
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
18 A 17/2026; PPR-43826/ČJ-2026-990210-PD; PPR-44020/ČJ-2026-990210-PD; PPR-52605/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
Information request and criminal complaint concerning THC/THCA methodology and forensic practice Original PDF
224
Office of the President of the Czech Republic
KPR 5080/2026
Urgent evidentiary supplement and invitation to the reopening hearing on 30 November 2026 Original PDF
223
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026
Urgent evidentiary supplement and invitation to the reopening hearing on 30 November 2026 Original PDF
222
Ministry of Justice
18 A 23/2026; MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ; MSP-162/2026-ODKA-SPZ
Urgent evidentiary supplement on forensic THC issues and the Ministry of Justice's responsibility Original PDF
221
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
18 A 17/2026; PPR-52605/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
Urgent evidentiary supplement concerning internal review of police forensic laboratories Original PDF
220
Ministry of the Interior
15 A 44/2026; MV-108890-3/TP-2026; MV-97289/TP-2026; MV-114818/TP-2026
Urgent evidentiary supplement concerning THC methodology and internal review Original PDF
219
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026; 2 T 104/2010; 2 T 65/2011
Evidentiary supplement for reopening proceedings and invitation to the hearings on 30 November 2026 Original PDF
218
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement concerning new regional-prosecution notices and the closed review chain Original PDF
217
Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 VZN 1678/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement concerning new regional-prosecution notices and the closed review chain Original PDF
216
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
3 VZN 239/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement concerning new regional-prosecution notices and the closed review chain Original PDF
215
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026; 18 A 23/2026
Joint urgent evidentiary supplement concerning disputed forensic practices in analysing THC content in seized cannabis, THCA → THC conversion and possible legislative overlay of earlier practice Original PDF
214
Czech National Bank
bez přiděleného č. j.
Complaint concerning repeated Raiffeisenbank AML/KYC requests under Section 9 of Act No. 253/2008 and the threat of restricting or terminating banking services Original PDF
213
Raiffeisenbank OmbudsmanAlso addressed
bez přiděleného č. j.
Complaint to the Raiffeisenbank Ombudsman concerning repeated AML/KYC requests and the threat of restricting or terminating banking services Original PDF
212
Ostrava Regional Court
5 To 248/2026; 15 T 11/2025
Joint summary submission and evidentiary motion on reviewability of THC measurement and the Danish, European Commission and Czech Defence Lawyers’ Union materials Original PDF
211
Office of the President of the Czech RepublicAlso addressed
KPR 5080/2026
Confirmation of key evidence and supplement to the file for consideration of cannabis amnesty, pardons and rehabilitation Original PDF
210
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
6 NZN 1737/2026
Confirmation of key evidence and supplement to the pre-litigation demand concerning the THC determination methodology Original PDF
209
Ministry of JusticeAlso addressed
18 A 23/2026
Additional material for review of expert activity and analytical determination of THC Original PDF
208
Police Presidium of the Czech RepublicAlso addressed
18 A 17/2026
Request for methodological and laboratory records concerning analytical determination of THC and THCA Original PDF
207
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Confirmation of key evidence for reopening proceedings 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 before the public hearings on 12 and 13 October 2026 Original PDF
206
Office of the President of the Czech RepublicAlso addressed
KPR 5080/2026
Annex to the filing of 4 October 2026 – Cannabis is The Cure evidence chronology 2008–2026 Original PDF
205
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
6 NZN 1737/2026
Annex to the filing of 4 October 2026 – Cannabis is The Cure evidence chronology 2008–2026 Original PDF
204
Ministry of JusticeAlso addressed
18 A 23/2026
Annex to the filing of 4 October 2026 – Cannabis is The Cure evidence chronology 2008–2026 Original PDF
203
Police Presidium of the Czech RepublicAlso addressed
18 A 17/2026
Annex to the filing of 4 October 2026 – Cannabis is The Cure evidence chronology 2008–2026 Original PDF
202
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Annex to the filing of 4 October 2026 – Cannabis is The Cure evidence chronology 2008–2026, current to 28 September 2026 Original PDF
201
Policie České republiky – Národní centrála proti organizovanému zločinu SKPV
18 A 17/2026
Claimant’s response to court letter 18 A 17/2026-191; preserving equality of arms and adversarial proceedings Original PDF
200
Prague Municipal CourtCopy
18 A 17/2026
For the court file: claimant’s response to letter 18 A 17/2026-191 Original PDF
199
Obvodní soud pro Prahu 10
3 Cm 2/2026; 3 Cmo 24/2026-26; nová sp. zn. dosud nesdělena
Supplement and clarification of the action following the Prague High Court order; request for the new case number Original PDF
198
Office for Personal Data Protection
SIN 55/2026-19; KPR 5772/2026-2; podnět z 14. 7. 2026
Complaint about inaction by the Czech Data Protection Authority and request for immediate procedural action in three separate matters Original PDF
197
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026
Urgent supplement to the action – new evidence: Czech Defence Lawyers’ Union Statement No. 3/2026 Original PDF
196
Ministry of JusticeAlso addressed
MSP-162/2026-ODKA-SPZ; MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ
Urgent supplement to the supervisory request – new evidence: Czech Defence Lawyers’ Union Statement No. 3/2026 Original PDF
195
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026
Procedural statement on the court letter of 30 September 2026 and preliminary reply to the NCOZ statement of 20 May 2026 Original PDF
194
Czech Defence Lawyers’ Union
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Urgent request to arrange pro bono defence counsel Original PDF
193
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Joint application for free defence and appointment of defence counsel Original PDF
192
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement – closed chain of responsibility Original PDF
191
Prague High Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
1 VZN 1678/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement – closed chain of responsibility Original PDF
190
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
3 VZN 239/2026
Urgent joint evidentiary supplement – closed chain of responsibility Original PDF
189
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
1 KZT 475/2026; 1 KZN 1079/2026
Complaint about inaction in two review proceedings in Brno Original PDF
188
Evropská veřejná ochránkyně práv
stížnost na EUDA
Complaint to the European Ombudsman concerning EUDA’s oversight of THC data (Czech version) Original PDF
187
Evropská veřejná ochránkyně práv
stížnost na EUDA
Complaint to the European Ombudsman concerning EUDA’s oversight of THC data (English version) Original PDF
186
European Union Drugs Agency
EXO/FHP/pd (26) D 106
Fundamental objection to EUDA response of 25 September concerning comparability of THC data Original PDF
185
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026; 18 A 23/2026-182
Reply to the Justice Ministry’s statement and request to consider subsequent records Original PDF
184
Czech Television
CT 338889/2025
Invitation to Czech Television and its Council to public reopening hearings Original PDF
183
Czech Television CouncilAlso addressed
CT 338889/2025
Invitation to Czech Television and its Council to public reopening hearings Original PDF
182
Council for Radio and Television BroadcastingCopy
RRTV/2026/20/fej
Invitation to Czech Television and its Council to public reopening hearings Original PDF
181
Office for Personal Data ProtectionCopy
podnět z 14. 7. 2026
Invitation to Czech Television and its Council to public reopening hearings Original PDF
180
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026; 18 A 17/2026-182
Request to clarify procedural status after the court’s letter of 23 September Original PDF
179
Nejvyšší správní soud
18 A 17/2026; § 174a
Motion to set a deadline for the Prague Municipal Court to decide Original PDF
178
Prague Municipal CourtVia
18 A 17/2026
Motion to set a deadline for the Prague Municipal Court to decide Original PDF
177
Office of the President of the Czech Republic
KPR 5080/2026; KPR 4093/2026
Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions Original PDF
176
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s OfficeCopy
6 NZN 1737/2026
Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions Original PDF
175
Ministry of JusticeCopy
MSP-162/2026-ODKA-SPZ; 18 A 23/2026
Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions Original PDF
174
Police Presidium of the Czech RepublicCopy
PPR-44020/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions Original PDF
173
Prostějov District CourtAlso addressed
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Third urgent pardon supplement, invitation to public hearings and evidentiary motions Original PDF
172
Prague 4 District Court
10 C 69/2026
Supplement to factual allegations and reply to Czech Television in the civil action Original PDF
171
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026
Supplement to the action with accreditation request and legislative developments Original PDF
170
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Corrected procedural and evidentiary supplement before public hearings Public PDF copy
169
Krajský soud v BrněAlso addressed
9 To 315/2026; 9 To 316/2026
Corrected procedural and evidentiary supplement before public hearings Public PDF copy
168
Prague Municipal Court
15 Ad 14/2026; 8 Ad 9/2026
Question about transfer and refund of court fees in two cases Original PDF
167
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Consolidated procedural and evidentiary supplement for reopening two criminal cases Public PDF copy
166
Krajský soud v BrněAlso addressed
9 To 315/2026; 9 To 316/2026
Consolidated procedural and evidentiary supplement for reopening two criminal cases Public PDF copy
165
Prostějov District Court
15 Nt 3104/2026; 15 Nt 3106/2026
Evidence supplement on reopening and a related prosecution request Original PDF
164
Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
1 ZT 11/2010; ZN 4/2026
Evidence supplement on reopening and a related prosecution request Original PDF
163
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026
Final statement on the pre-action demand to NSZ and the Czech Television complaint Original PDF
162
Czech TelevisionAlso addressed
CT 338889/2025
Final statement on the pre-action demand to NSZ and the Czech Television complaint Original PDF
161
Czech Television CouncilAlso addressed
CT 338889/2025
Final statement on the pre-action demand to NSZ and the Czech Television complaint Original PDF
160
Krajský soud v Brně
9 To 315/2026; 9 To 316/2026
Joint evidence supplement to complaints and supervisory proceedings Original PDF
159
Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
3 VZN 239/2026
Joint evidence supplement to complaints and supervisory proceedings Original PDF
158
Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAlso addressed
1 KZT 475/2026; 1 KZN 1079/2026
Joint evidence supplement to complaints and supervisory proceedings Original PDF
157
Ministry of Justice
MSP-162/2026-ODKA-SPZ
Request to supervise police expert work and review laboratory accreditation Public PDF copy
156
Český institut pro akreditaci, o. p. s.Also addressed
přezkum akreditace policejních laboratoří
Request to supervise police expert work and review laboratory accreditation Public PDF copy
155
Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
PPR-24960/ČJ-2026-990810; KU-4139/ČJ-2026-2305KM
Second urgent supplement to Police President review request on THC testing Original PDF
154
Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
6 NZN 1737/2026
Tenth supplement to the pre-action demand with GIBS and Justice Minister records Original PDF
153
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 17/2026
Supplement to the action with a new GIBS notice Original PDF
152
Prague Municipal Court
18 A 23/2026
Supplement to the action with a new Justice Minister response Original PDF
LIVE CHURCH RECORDOn 31 August 2026, the Ministry of Culture stopped the new proceeding by order MK 53547/2026 SOCNS and issued statement MK 53559/2026 SOCNS. A remonstrance was filed on 1 September 2026; the active stage is now the remonstrance procedure under Section 152 of the Administrative Procedure Code.Open the current procedural chain →
Jiří Votruba
STORY OF THE DAY · 11 SEPTEMBER 2026 · REPORT 11092026-013
Authorial commentary on Government item 684/26, CBD, THCA and disputed police forensic practice; allegations of unlawful conduct are attributed to the author.
Editorial boundary: allegations of unlawful or criminal conduct are attributed to the author and are not final findings by public authorities.
Jiří Votruba
