Evidence boundary
The Czech official records and linked Czech PDFs remain the controlling sources. This page translates the project’s factual descriptions; it does not replace the originals or provide legal advice.
A transfer, referral, acknowledgement, review or opening of a proceeding is reported as a procedural act. It is not presented as proof of wrongdoing or as a prediction of the final outcome.
For subsequent filings, To identifies the receiving authority, while For identifies a separately documented authority expected to decide or substantively handle the filing. “For” is omitted when no distinct authority is documented.
Active court proceedings since 1 May 2026
Start: 29 July 2025
Prague Municipal Court, case 45 T 1/2024 – returned by the Prague High Court
Start: 1 May 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 18 A 17/2026 – National Centre against Organised Crime
Start: 31 May 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 8 Ad 9/2026 – Ministry of Health
Start: 4 June 2026
Prague 4 District Court, case 10 C 69/2026 – Czech Television
Start: 15 June 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 18 A 23/2026 – Ministry of Justice
Start: 12 July 2026
Prostějov District Court, case 2 T 104/2010 – reopening
Start: 12 July 2026
Prostějov District Court – preventive filing 2026
Start: 22 July 2026
Ostrava District Court, case 15 T 11/2025
Start: 23 July 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 15 A 44/2026 – Ministry of the Interior
Proceedings from 1 May 2026 — when will Godot arrive?
Date: 6 May 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Liberec
Reference: 131 EX 8674/15-127
What happened: Order concerning the application to discontinue enforcement proceedings
Date: 6 May 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-15
What happened: Request to clarify and supplement the filing
Date: 7 May 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 17/2026-15
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 12 May 2026
From: Olomouc District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 22/2025-95
What happened: Notice that the proceeding was discontinued because the CZK 6,800 charge for providing the requested information had not been paid
Date: 13 May 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-32
What happened: Transfer of the filing to the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Date: 19 May 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 4093/2026
What happened: Registration of the request for a pardon and cannabis amnesty
Date: 20 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61061/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 21 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61072/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 22 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61060/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 22 May 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4324-2/ČJ-2026-4100PI
What happened: Communication concerning a freedom-of-information request
Date: 22 May 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-24960-8/ČJ-2026-990810
What happened: Communication concerning a freedom-of-information request
Date: 29 May 2026
From: Ministry of Health
Reference: MZDR 13429/2026-3/OLZP
What happened: Disposition of the complaint
Date: 1 June 2026
From: Czech Television
Reference: CT 338889/2025-38
What happened: Rejection of the settlement proposal
Date: 1 June 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4324-4/ČJ-2026-4100PI
What happened: The complaint was dealt with through internal reconsideration
Date: 3 June 2026
From: Ministry of Justice
Reference: MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/7
What happened: Rejection of the complaint
Date: 5 June 2026
From: Czech Social Security Administration
Reference: 30000/03006091/26
What happened: Request to submit a report
Date: 5 June 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 4093/2026
What happened: Notice that the request for a pardon was not granted
Date: 10 June 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Plzeň
Reference: 134 EX 07180/19-509
What happened: Discontinuation of enforcement proceedings
Date: 11 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 197/2026-12
What happened: Division of the filing among several authorities
Date: 15 June 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4871-5/ČJ-2026-410066-E
What happened: Communication stating lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Date: 16 June 2026
From: Czech Social Security Administration
Reference: CJ 00002/2026
What happened: Apology and withdrawal of the previous request
Date: 17 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 197/2026-18
What happened: Transfer of part of the filing
Date: 22 June 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Liberec
Reference: 131 EX 8674/15-143
What happened: Discontinuation of enforcement proceedings
Date: 22 June 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 VZN 1678/2026-8
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for supervisory review
Date: 23 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-25
What happened: Request to supplement the action
Date: 25 June 2026
From: Institute of Criminalistics of the Police of the Czech Republic
Reference: KU-4139-5/ČJ-2026-2305KM
What happened: Response to a freedom-of-information request
Date: 26 June 2026
From: Prague 4 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZN 320/2026-11
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 7 July 2026
From: Prague 4 District Court
Reference: 10 C 69/2026-14
What happened: Request to supplement the action
Date: 7 July 2026
From: Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZT 11/2010-752
What happened: Notice concerning the applications to reopen proceedings
Date: 8 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 4 KZN 7116/2026-45
What happened: Transfer of the filing
Date: 9 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 8 Ad 9/2026-22
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 13 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Court
Reference: Fj 68842/2026/KSOS
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 14 July 2026
From: Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 15/2026-5
What happened: Notification of the file reference
Date: 14 July 2026
From: Prague 4 District Court
Reference: 10 C 69/2026-49
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 15 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-108890-3/TP-2026
What happened: Decision on the complaint
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-97289-3/TP-2026
What happened: Decision on the complaint
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting
Reference: RRTV/7757/2026-fej
What happened: Communication concerning consideration of the submission
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 VZN 239/2026-27
What happened: Notice of the result of supervisory review
Date: 17 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 2 KZN 55/2025-122
What happened: Communication concerning the pending proceeding and time period
Date: 20 July 2026
From: Olomouc Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPM-100092-2/ČJ-2026-1412UO
What happened: Communication that the filing was placed on file
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 KZT 475/2026-32
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for review
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 ZN 140/2026-3
What happened: Notice of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-114818-2/TP-2026
What happened: Communication concerning the complaints
Date: 22 July 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 45728/2026 SOCNS
What happened: Commencement of a new proceeding
Date: 23 July 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 VZN 1678/2026-70
What happened: Notice of the result of supervisory review
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: ZN 87/2026-47
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: ZN 4/2026-6
What happened: Return of the matter to the Police
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Office for Personal Data Protection
Reference: UOOU-05058/26-2
What happened: Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Office for Personal Data Protection
Reference: UOOU-05093/26-2
What happened: Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated
Date: 29 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 4 KZN 7116/2026-50
What happened: Transfer of the supplement to the filing
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5772/2026-1
What happened: Communication concerning the pardon and cannabis-amnesty procedure
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 48/2026-12
What happened: Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 55/2026-19
What happened: Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Prague 2 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZN 157/2026-33
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 31 July 2026
From: Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 KZN 1079/2026-14
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for review
Date: 3 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5080/2026
What happened: Statement concerning the supporting materials in the pardon and amnesty matter
Date: 5 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPT-203594-3/ČJ-2026-0700KR
What happened: Extension of the time limit for the freedom-of-information request
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5772/2026-2
What happened: Following the complaint, the Office reconsidered the supplemented request, supplied further information and described the result as full relief through internal reconsideration
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3103/2026-53
What happened: Under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court rejected the application to reopen two proceedings concluded by orders ref. 2 Nt 1151/2014-80 and 3 Nt 1151/2014-411, in which protective measures in the form of forfeiture of property had been imposed
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3105/2026-54
What happened: The Court rejected as inadmissible under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure an application to reopen proceedings concerning forfeiture of property
Date: 7 August 2026
From: European Union Drugs Agency
Reference: no separate reference number in the email
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the formal call to act under Article 265 TFEU and an indication that a further response would follow
Date: 10 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-130
What happened: Order to pay a court fee of CZK 2,000 within 15 days in the intervention action against the Ministry of Justice
Date: 10 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-131
What happened: Request to state whether the claimant agrees to determination without a hearing under Section 51(1) of the Code of Administrative Justice
Date: 11 August 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-127234-2/OBP-2026
What happened: The Ministry of the Interior refused Ganja For All Animals, z.s.’s request under Section 11b of the Freedom of Information Act, stating that it held none of the requested information
Date: 12 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: 4873/2026
What happened: The Office declined to assist with the proposal to fly a cannabis standard above Prague Castle, referring generally to the number of requests and its limited capacity to accommodate them
Date: 12 August 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 49467/2026 SOCNS
What happened: The Ministry of Culture formally confirmed that the proceeding for a new proceeding and decision under Section 101(b) of the Code of Administrative Procedure had commenced on 26 June 2026
Date: 13 August 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-73
What happened: The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office stated that the requests concerning the Ministry of Justice, the court proceedings and the settlement proposal fell outside its remit, and transferred the part seeking review of the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office to the Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office. The record is dated 13 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026
Date: 14 August 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-43826-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
What happened: The Police Presidium’s Internal Control Office declared that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the complaint concerning inactivity by the Institute of Criminalistics and transferred it to the office of the Institute’s director
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Olomouc Region Public Health Authority
Reference: KHSOC/33066/2026/SPR; sp. zn. KHSOC/31529/2026
What happened: The Olomouc Region Public Health Authority provided information on hygiene requirements for transporting biological material; it stated that it does not inspect the temperature regime because it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, has no specific methodology for the listed non-conformities and has conducted no such inspection since 1 January 2021
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-42608-3/ČJ-2026-990810
What happened: The Police Presidium provided information on the receipt, custody, transport and handover of venous blood samples; it stated that its internal instruments do not regulate the requested chain-of-custody details or a maximum transport time and that since 1 January 2021 it has issued no methodology on defects in sample transport or handover
Date: 17 August 2026
From: State Institute for Drug Control
Reference: sukl252539/2026; sp. zn. sukls242547/2026
What happened: The State Institute for Drug Control referred questions 2–7 to the blood decree and the Good Practice Guidelines for Blood Establishments; it stated that it has no specialised inspection methodology and records no requested inspection findings or measures since 1 January 2021
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 233/2026-9
What happened: The Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the appeal and upheld the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office decision refusing information about the receipt, registration and transfer of filings. It described the contested decision as being at the very edge of reviewability, supplied an expanded rationale of its own and concluded that the request constituted an abuse of rights. The decision is dated 17 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026
Date: 18 August 2026
From: Ministry of Transport
Reference: MD-46042/2026-010/4; sp. zn. MD/46042/2026/010
What happened: The Ministry of Transport deferred the freedom-of-information request concerning the collection, transport and storage of blood samples. It stated that it holds no documents concerning those matters and has never held any, considered the requested information outside its remit, and referred the applicant to the Police of the Czech Republic, the Police Presidium, the Ministry of the Interior or the Ministry of Health.
Date: 18 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3104/2026-56; souvisí s 2 T 104/2010
What happened: The Prostějov District Court summoned Dušan Dvořák to a public hearing on the application to reopen proceedings on 12 October 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 17 and stated that his attendance was required. It also stated that cases 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 could not be joined because they had ended at different procedural stages
Date: 19 August 2026
From: Olomouc University Hospital
Reference: příloha poskytnutá dne 19. 8. 2026; STL2015_11 ze dne 2. 11. 2015
What happened: Olomouc University Hospital provided, in response to the request concerning transport of blood, recommendation STL2015_11 on storage and transport of blood, blood components, starting material for further manufacture and blood products.
Date: 19 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 8 Ad 9/2026-80
What happened: The Prague Municipal Court forwarded to the claimant, for information, the Ministry of Health’s statement of defence and its supplement in the intervention action.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 2 KZN 55/2025-136
What happened: The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office dealt with filings dated 25 April, 10, 12 and 27 May, 2 and 4 June, and 15 and 19 July 2026; it found no reason to exercise the power under Section 157(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and placed the specified filings on file without further action.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR
What happened: The Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate partially answered the freedom-of-information request concerning SOPs and methodological documentation used by the Frýdek-Místek forensic unit in 2009–2019, providing a representative-sampling methodology and a list of methodological visits and destruction records.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPT-203594-8/ČJ-2026-0700KR
What happened: Decision partially refusing the freedom-of-information request: the Police stated that in 2009–2019 the Frýdek-Místek forensic unit had no SOPs for determining THC, no written methodological instructions for homogenisation or determination of THC/THCA, no methodology for measurement uncertainty and no validation protocols; some control files had been destroyed after retention periods expired.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: příloha k KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR
What happened: Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: list of files concerning methodological and expert visits, inter-laboratory tests and destruction records from 2009–2019.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: příloha k KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR; RŘ KÚ č. 54/2021; KU-8331-1/ČJ-2021-2305KM
What happened: Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: Director of the Institute of Criminalistics Order No. 54/2021 on the examination of cannabis and cannabinoids.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: příloha k KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR; příloha č. 1 k RŘ KÚ č. 54/2021
What happened: Annex to ref. KRPT-203594-7/ČJ-2026-0700KR: methodology for taking a representative sample of plant material, Annex 1 to Director’s Order No. 54/2021.
Date: 20 August 2026
From: Institute of Criminalistics of the Police of the Czech Republic
Reference: KU-4139-12/ČJ-2026-2305KM
What happened: The Institute of Criminalistics stated that it was unaware of any error in forensic work, that the quality of forensic work is monitored through methodological and expert visits, and that it was not obliged, at the applicant’s request, to review forensic procedures and methods used in expert work.
Date: 24 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 2 KZN 683/2026-31
What happened: The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office returned the materials submitted on 15 June 2026 after finding that they did not fall within the competence of the public prosecution service. It referred the submitter to the actual addressees and advised that the disposition could be submitted for review to the immediately superior public prosecutor’s office under Section 16a(7) of the Public Prosecutor’s Office Act.
Date: 24 August 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-44020-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
What happened: The Internal Control Office of the Police Presidium declined superior review under Section 97(3) of the Police Act on the ground that the preceding mandatory examination under Section 97 had not taken place at the Institute of Criminalistics, and placed the filing of 15 August 2026 on file without further action.
Date: 25 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 15 A 44/2026-43
What happened: The Prague Municipal Court rejected the intervention action against the Ministry of the Interior without examining the merits. It held that the Ministry’s handling of two complaints under Section 175 of the Administrative Procedure Code could not, by its nature, constitute an unlawful intervention under Section 82 of the Code of Administrative Justice. The order states that a cassation complaint may be filed within two weeks of service.
Date: 25 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3106/2026
What happened: The Prostějov District Court stated that criminal cases 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 had ended at different procedural stages and therefore could not be joined for common proceedings.
Date: 25 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3106/2026
What happened: The Prostějov District Court summoned Dušan Dvořák to a public hearing on the application to reopen criminal proceedings, scheduled for 13 October 2026 at 09:00 in courtroom 18, second floor.
Date: 25 August 2026
From: National Institute of Public Health
Reference: SZU/10724/2026
What happened: The National Institute of Public Health responded to the information request concerning transport, storage and handover of human blood samples. It stated that pre-analytical handling and transport are the responsibility of the healthcare provider sending the sample, referred to its laboratory sampling manual, and stated that since 1 January 2021 it has recorded no degradation, refusal or challenge of a blood sample because of transport conditions.
Date: 26 August 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Court
Reference: St 82/2026; souvisí s 15 T 11/2025
What happened: The Ostrava Regional Court confirmed that on 24 August 2026 it received a complaint concerning the conduct of proceedings before the Ostrava District Court in case 15 T 11/2025. Because the chair of the Ostrava District Court is competent to deal with the complaint, the Regional Court forwarded it to her on 26 August 2026.
Date: 26 August 2026
From: National Institute of Public Health
Reference: SZU/10724/2026
What happened: The National Institute of Public Health issued a decision partially refusing the information request under Section 11b of the Czech Freedom of Information Act. It refused information concerning methodologies, temperature ranges, transport without a validated box, high-temperature transport conditions, temperature monitoring and generally applicable validation requirements, stating that these matters fall within the competence of the healthcare providers sending samples. The decision may be appealed within 15 days to the Czech Office for Personal Data Protection through the Institute.
Date: 26 August 2026
From: Office for Personal Data Protection
Reference: UOOU-05841/26-3
What happened: The Czech Office for Personal Data Protection stated that the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office sent the appeal and the case file on 12 August 2026, but they were not received by the Office until 17 August 2026. According to the Office, the fifteen-day period under Section 16(3) of the Freedom of Information Act therefore runs from that delivery and expires on 1 September 2026. The Office also stated that no procedural act had yet been taken in the appeal proceedings and that the separate submission of 14 July 2026, supplemented on 12 August 2026, would be handled by the competent department in a separate letter.
Date: 27 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 974/2026-100
What happened: The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office completed supervisory review of the Prague 4 District Public Prosecutor’s Office in file 1 ZN 320/2026. It found no error requiring corrective action, dismissed the supervisory submission as unfounded and stated that the matter was finally disposed of at that level. It also advised that further submissions of identical content would no longer be reviewed or acknowledged.
Date: 27 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 974/2026-103
What happened: The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office completed supervisory review of the Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office in file ZN 87/2026. The review concerned the part of the submission relating to officials of the Ministry of the Interior. The Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office concluded that the materials did not sufficiently particularise facts indicating an offence under Sections 329 or 330 of the Criminal Code or another criminal offence, dismissed the supervisory submission as unfounded and stated that the matter was finally disposed of at that level. It also advised that further submissions of identical content would no longer be reviewed or acknowledged.
Date: 28 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 8 Ad 9/2026-85
What happened: The Prague Municipal Court rejected the intervention action against the Ministry of Health under Section 46(1)(a) of the Code of Administrative Justice, finding that the challenged classification of medicinal cannabis as a ‘highly addictive substance’ was not an individualised intervention against the claimant but part of the general statutory and regulatory framework. No party was awarded costs. After the order becomes final, the claimant is to receive a refund of the full CZK 2,000 court fee because the action was rejected before the first hearing; the Court requested bank details within 10 days. A cassation complaint may be filed within two weeks of service.
Date: 31 August 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 53547/2026 SOCNS
What happened: The Czech Ministry of Culture discontinued the proceeding on the preparatory committee’s request for a new proceeding and a new decision concerning registration of the Cannabis Church under Section 101(b) of the Administrative Procedure Code. It accepted that the original registration request had been finally refused, but concluded that the new legal, factual, evidentiary and doctrinal circumstances did not justify a favourable new decision. The Ministry treated changes in cannabis law, THC/THCA forensic issues, EU-law arguments and the legal regime of cannabis religious objects as irrelevant to registration, regarded the more detailed explanation of the Church’s teaching as not constituting a new fact, and again concluded that the Cannabis Church did not satisfy the statutory definition of a church and religious society. A remonstrance may be filed within 15 days of service; it has no suspensive effect.
Date: 31 August 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 53559/2026 SOCNS
What happened: The Czech Ministry of Culture answered questions raised in submissions of 26 June and 7 July 2026 and later supplements concerning the procedural status and registration of the Cannabis Church. It confirmed that the original registration proceeding had been finally concluded by the 2019 refusal, that the preparatory committee and its representative were and remain recorded as parties, and referred to the parallel order MK 53547/2026 SOCNS. The Ministry stated that it lacked competence to assess THC/THCA forensic methodology, the European Commission position or Danish materials, and treated the EU-law and preliminary-reference issues as irrelevant to the registration proceeding. It also stated that it had assessed the submissions according to their substance, good-administration principles, religious neutrality and protection of religious pluralism, and offered a possible personal meeting on further merits-related questions.
Date: 1 September 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 974/2026-108
What happened: The Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office re-examined the relevant part of Dušan Dvořák's filing of 27 May 2026 and follow-up filings of 14, 15 and 19 July 2026 after the Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor's Office returned the transferred part under reference 3 ZN 140/2026-3. The Prague office concluded that the filings, insofar as they concerned persons serving or formerly serving at the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, did not contain concrete facts reasonably indicating an offence under Sections 329, 330 or another provision of the Criminal Code. It therefore filed the submissions without further action under Section 16a of the Public Prosecutor's Office Act and treated them as disposed of. The notice expressly states that the manner of disposal may be submitted for review under Section 16a(7) to the Prague High Public Prosecutor's Office.
Date: 1 September 2026
From: Ministry of Health
Reference: MZDR 21970/2026-3/MIN/KAN
What happened: The Czech Ministry of Health answered ten freedom-of-information questions submitted by Ganja For All Animals, z.s. about the collection, storage and transport of blood samples, blood and blood components. It cited the applicable legislation, the ČSN EN ISO 15189:2023 standard and professional guidance, and described storage temperatures, validation of transport boxes and vehicles, and transport monitoring. At the same time, the Ministry stated that it held neither the requested record and protocol templates nor inspection findings, methodological positions or records of temperature or time deviations since 1 January 2021, and refused those parts of the request. It identified the State Institute for Drug Control as the supervisory authority for blood banks, blood establishments and healthcare providers.
Date: 1 September 2026
From: Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting
Reference: RRTV/8853/2026-bur; sp. zn. RRTV/2026/560/kar
What happened: On 1 September 2026, the Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting, under ref. RRTV/8853/2026-bur and case file RRTV/2026/560/kar, shelved the filing concerning Czech Television’s reporting on cannabis without opening misdemeanor proceedings. The Council found that the filing referred to an unspecified part of Czech Television’s programming and contained no facts actionable within its supervisory competence. Its notice states that no court action may be filed against the decision under Section 66 of Act No. 231/2001.
Date: 2 September 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5080/2026
What happened: The Head of the Office of the President dealt with the complaint concerning the Office’s procedure and stated that later submissions recorded under KPR 5080/2026 had not yet been decided
Date: 3 September 2026
From: Frýdek-Místek District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZN 7061/2026-79
What happened: The Frýdek-Místek District Public Prosecutor’s Office closed the filings without further action and advised that the handling may be reviewed by the Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office under Section 16a(7)
Date: 4 September 2026
From: Supreme Administrative Court
Reference: 6 As 207/2026-13; navazuje na 15 A 44/2026-43
What happened: The Supreme Administrative Court confirmed receipt on 2 September 2026 of the cassation complaint against Prague Municipal Court order 15 A 44/2026-43 and requested a completed statement of personal, property and income circumstances within one week of service so it can decide the requests for exemption from court fees and appointment of counsel
Date: 8 September 2026
From: General Inspection of Security Forces
Reference: GI-3794-4/ČJ-2026-840502-P
What happened: The General Inspection of Security Forces stated on 8 September 2026, under ref. GI-3794-4/ČJ-2026-840502-P, that the filings delivered on 15 and 24 August 2026 concerning review of 2009-2019 proceedings and internal review of police procedures for determining THC in cannabis had been forwarded, according to subject-matter and territorial competence, to the Police Presidium of the Czech Republic for further measures. The Inspection also stated that it lacked authority to assess the challenged Police procedures or the factual and legal questions concerning evidence, and expressly treated the matter as disposed of on its side.
Date: 8 September 2026
From: Ministry of Justice
Reference: MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/27
What happened: The Minister of Justice treated the submissions delivered on 12 July, 15 July, 10 August and 25 August 2026 as a request for measures against inactivity under Section 80(2) of the Administrative Procedure Code. He found the request unfounded, declined to take an inactivity measure and stated that the filing of 12 July 2026 was disposed of by this letter. He also stated that a settlement cannot be concluded in the administrative action and that further filings without new material facts may be placed on file without further written notice.
Date: 9 September 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 8 Ad 9/2026-89
What happened: On 9 September 2026, under ref. 8 Ad 9/2026-89, the Prague Municipal Court asked the claimant to provide a bank account number so that the court fee could be refunded pursuant to operative part III of the order of 28 August 2026, ref. 8 Ad 9/2026-85. The letter is an administrative follow-up implementing the already ordered refund; it does not itself decide the merits of the intervention action or record a new remedy.
Additional tracked filings without an explicit reaction link
These filings are translated and retained separately because the canonical registry does not identify a specific state record to which they should be attached.