Evidence boundary
The Czech official records and linked Czech PDFs remain the controlling sources. This page translates the project’s factual descriptions; it does not replace the originals or provide legal advice.
A transfer, referral, acknowledgement, review or opening of a proceeding is reported as a procedural act. It is not presented as proof of wrongdoing or as a prediction of the final outcome.
For subsequent filings, To identifies the receiving authority, while For identifies a separately documented authority expected to decide or substantively handle the filing. “For” is omitted when no distinct authority is documented.
Active court proceedings since 1 May 2026
Start: 29 July 2025
Prague Municipal Court, case 45 T 1/2024 – returned by the Prague High Court
Start: 1 May 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 18 A 17/2026 – National Centre against Organised Crime
Start: 31 May 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 8 Ad 9/2026 – Ministry of Health
Start: 4 June 2026
Prague 4 District Court, case 10 C 69/2026 – Czech Television
Start: 15 June 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 18 A 23/2026 – Ministry of Justice
Start: 12 July 2026
Prostějov District Court, case 2 T 104/2010 – reopening
Start: 12 July 2026
Prostějov District Court – preventive filing 2026
Start: 22 July 2026
Ostrava District Court, case 15 T 11/2025
Start: 23 July 2026
Prague Municipal Court, case 15 A 44/2026 – Ministry of the Interior
Proceedings from 1 May 2026 — when will Godot arrive?
Date: 6 May 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Liberec
Reference: 131 EX 8674/15-127
What happened: Order concerning the application to discontinue enforcement proceedings
Date: 6 May 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-15
What happened: Request to clarify and supplement the filing
Date: 7 May 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 17/2026-15
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 12 May 2026
From: Olomouc District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 22/2025-95
What happened: Notice that the proceeding was discontinued because the CZK 6,800 charge for providing the requested information had not been paid
Date: 13 May 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-32
What happened: Transfer of the filing to the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Date: 19 May 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 4093/2026
What happened: Registration of the request for a pardon and cannabis amnesty
Date: 20 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61061/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 21 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61072/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 22 May 2026
From: Brno Regional Court
Reference: Fj 61060/2026/KSBR
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 22 May 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4324-2/ČJ-2026-4100PI
What happened: Communication concerning a freedom-of-information request
Date: 22 May 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-24960-8/ČJ-2026-990810
What happened: Communication concerning a freedom-of-information request
Date: 29 May 2026
From: Ministry of Health
Reference: MZDR 13429/2026-3/OLZP
What happened: Disposition of the complaint
Date: 1 June 2026
From: Czech Television
Reference: CT 338889/2025-38
What happened: Rejection of the settlement proposal
Date: 1 June 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4324-4/ČJ-2026-4100PI
What happened: The complaint was dealt with through internal reconsideration
Date: 3 June 2026
From: Ministry of Justice
Reference: MSP-19/2026-ODKA-ROZ/7
What happened: Rejection of the complaint
Date: 5 June 2026
From: Czech Social Security Administration
Reference: 30000/03006091/26
What happened: Request to submit a report
Date: 5 June 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 4093/2026
What happened: Notice that the request for a pardon was not granted
Date: 10 June 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Plzeň
Reference: 134 EX 07180/19-509
What happened: Discontinuation of enforcement proceedings
Date: 11 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 197/2026-12
What happened: Division of the filing among several authorities
Date: 15 June 2026
From: National Centre against Organised Crime
Reference: NCOZ-4871-5/ČJ-2026-410066-E
What happened: Communication stating lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Date: 16 June 2026
From: Czech Social Security Administration
Reference: CJ 00002/2026
What happened: Apology and withdrawal of the previous request
Date: 17 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 KZN 197/2026-18
What happened: Transfer of part of the filing
Date: 22 June 2026
From: Court Enforcement Officer — Liberec
Reference: 131 EX 8674/15-143
What happened: Discontinuation of enforcement proceedings
Date: 22 June 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 VZN 1678/2026-8
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for supervisory review
Date: 23 June 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-25
What happened: Request to supplement the action
Date: 25 June 2026
From: Institute of Criminalistics of the Police of the Czech Republic
Reference: KU-4139-5/ČJ-2026-2305KM
What happened: Response to a freedom-of-information request
Date: 26 June 2026
From: Prague 4 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZN 320/2026-11
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 7 July 2026
From: Prague 4 District Court
Reference: 10 C 69/2026-14
What happened: Request to supplement the action
Date: 7 July 2026
From: Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZT 11/2010-752
What happened: Notice concerning the applications to reopen proceedings
Date: 8 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 4 KZN 7116/2026-45
What happened: Transfer of the filing
Date: 9 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 8 Ad 9/2026-22
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 13 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Court
Reference: Fj 68842/2026/KSOS
What happened: Entry of changes in the public register
Date: 14 July 2026
From: Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 15/2026-5
What happened: Notification of the file reference
Date: 14 July 2026
From: Prague 4 District Court
Reference: 10 C 69/2026-49
What happened: Order to pay the court fee
Date: 15 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-108890-3/TP-2026
What happened: Decision on the complaint
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-97289-3/TP-2026
What happened: Decision on the complaint
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Council for Radio and Television Broadcasting
Reference: RRTV/7757/2026-fej
What happened: Communication concerning consideration of the submission
Date: 16 July 2026
From: Olomouc High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 VZN 239/2026-27
What happened: Notice of the result of supervisory review
Date: 17 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 2 KZN 55/2025-122
What happened: Communication concerning the pending proceeding and time period
Date: 20 July 2026
From: Olomouc Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPM-100092-2/ČJ-2026-1412UO
What happened: Communication that the filing was placed on file
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 KZT 475/2026-32
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for review
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Brno Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 3 ZN 140/2026-3
What happened: Notice of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Date: 21 July 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-114818-2/TP-2026
What happened: Communication concerning the complaints
Date: 22 July 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 45728/2026 SOCNS
What happened: Commencement of a new proceeding
Date: 23 July 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 VZN 1678/2026-70
What happened: Notice of the result of supervisory review
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Prague 7 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: ZN 87/2026-47
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: ZN 4/2026-6
What happened: Return of the matter to the Police
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Office for Personal Data Protection
Reference: UOOU-05058/26-2
What happened: Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated
Date: 28 July 2026
From: Office for Personal Data Protection
Reference: UOOU-05093/26-2
What happened: Notice that review proceedings would not be initiated
Date: 29 July 2026
From: Ostrava Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 4 KZN 7116/2026-50
What happened: Transfer of the supplement to the filing
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5772/2026-1
What happened: Communication concerning the pardon and cannabis-amnesty procedure
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 48/2026-12
What happened: Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 55/2026-19
What happened: Decision refusing the freedom-of-information request
Date: 30 July 2026
From: Prague 2 District Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 ZN 157/2026-33
What happened: Notice of the result of the examination
Date: 31 July 2026
From: Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 1 KZN 1079/2026-14
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the request for review
Date: 3 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5080/2026
What happened: Statement concerning the supporting materials in the pardon and amnesty matter
Date: 5 August 2026
From: Moravian-Silesian Regional Police Directorate
Reference: KRPT-203594-3/ČJ-2026-0700KR
What happened: Extension of the time limit for the freedom-of-information request
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: KPR 5772/2026-2
What happened: Following the complaint, the Office reconsidered the supplemented request, supplied further information and described the result as full relief through internal reconsideration
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3103/2026-53
What happened: Under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court rejected the application to reopen two proceedings concluded by orders ref. 2 Nt 1151/2014-80 and 3 Nt 1151/2014-411, in which protective measures in the form of forfeiture of property had been imposed
Date: 7 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3105/2026-54
What happened: The Court rejected as inadmissible under Section 283(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure an application to reopen proceedings concerning forfeiture of property
Date: 7 August 2026
From: European Union Drugs Agency
Reference: no separate reference number in the email
What happened: Acknowledgement of receipt of the formal call to act under Article 265 TFEU and an indication that a further response would follow
Date: 10 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-130
What happened: Order to pay a court fee of CZK 2,000 within 15 days in the intervention action against the Ministry of Justice
Date: 10 August 2026
From: Prague Municipal Court
Reference: 18 A 23/2026-131
What happened: Request to state whether the claimant agrees to determination without a hearing under Section 51(1) of the Code of Administrative Justice
Date: 11 August 2026
From: Ministry of the Interior
Reference: MV-127234-2/OBP-2026
What happened: The Ministry of the Interior refused Ganja For All Animals, z.s.’s request under Section 11b of the Freedom of Information Act, stating that it held none of the requested information
Date: 12 August 2026
From: Office of the President of the Republic
Reference: 4873/2026
What happened: The Office declined to assist with the proposal to fly a cannabis standard above Prague Castle, referring generally to the number of requests and its limited capacity to accommodate them
Date: 12 August 2026
From: Ministry of Culture
Reference: MK 49467/2026 SOCNS
What happened: The Ministry of Culture formally confirmed that the proceeding for a new proceeding and decision under Section 101(b) of the Code of Administrative Procedure had commenced on 26 June 2026
Date: 13 August 2026
From: Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: 6 NZN 1737/2026-73
What happened: The Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office stated that the requests concerning the Ministry of Justice, the court proceedings and the settlement proposal fell outside its remit, and transferred the part seeking review of the Prostějov District Public Prosecutor’s Office to the Brno Regional Public Prosecutor’s Office. The record is dated 13 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026
Date: 14 August 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-43826-2/ČJ-2026-990210-PD
What happened: The Police Presidium’s Internal Control Office declared that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the complaint concerning inactivity by the Institute of Criminalistics and transferred it to the office of the Institute’s director
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Olomouc Region Public Health Authority
Reference: KHSOC/33066/2026/SPR; sp. zn. KHSOC/31529/2026
What happened: The Olomouc Region Public Health Authority provided information on hygiene requirements for transporting biological material; it stated that it does not inspect the temperature regime because it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, has no specific methodology for the listed non-conformities and has conducted no such inspection since 1 January 2021
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Police Presidium of the Czech Republic
Reference: PPR-42608-3/ČJ-2026-990810
What happened: The Police Presidium provided information on the receipt, custody, transport and handover of venous blood samples; it stated that its internal instruments do not regulate the requested chain-of-custody details or a maximum transport time and that since 1 January 2021 it has issued no methodology on defects in sample transport or handover
Date: 17 August 2026
From: State Institute for Drug Control
Reference: sukl252539/2026; sp. zn. sukls242547/2026
What happened: The State Institute for Drug Control referred questions 2–7 to the blood decree and the Good Practice Guidelines for Blood Establishments; it stated that it has no specialised inspection methodology and records no requested inspection findings or measures since 1 January 2021
Date: 17 August 2026
From: Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office
Reference: SIN 233/2026-9
What happened: The Prague High Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the appeal and upheld the Prague Municipal Public Prosecutor’s Office decision refusing information about the receipt, registration and transfer of filings. It described the contested decision as being at the very edge of reviewability, supplied an expanded rationale of its own and concluded that the request constituted an abuse of rights. The decision is dated 17 August 2026 and was received on 18 August 2026
Date: 18 August 2026
From: Ministry of Transport
Reference: MD-46042/2026-010/4; sp. zn. MD/46042/2026/010
What happened: The Ministry of Transport deferred the freedom-of-information request concerning the collection, transport and storage of blood samples. It stated that it holds no documents concerning those matters and has never held any, considered the requested information outside its remit, and referred the applicant to the Police of the Czech Republic, the Police Presidium, the Ministry of the Interior or the Ministry of Health.
Date: 18 August 2026
From: Prostějov District Court
Reference: 15 Nt 3104/2026-56; souvisí s 2 T 104/2010
What happened: The Prostějov District Court summoned Dušan Dvořák to a public hearing on the application to reopen proceedings on 12 October 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 17 and stated that his attendance was required. It also stated that cases 2 T 104/2010 and 2 T 65/2011 could not be joined because they had ended at different procedural stages
Additional tracked filings without an explicit reaction link
These filings are translated and retained separately because the canonical registry does not identify a specific state record to which they should be attached.