The action challenges the Ministry’s communication of 21 July 2026, ref. MV-114818-2/TP-2026, which handled together two complaints of 15 and 17 July that differed in substance.
The Ministry stated that it could not assist the claimant and that the described matters fell outside its remit. The action alleges that the answer did not distinguish the individual parts, state the result of any review, or explain whether and where any part had been forwarded.
The claimant asks the Ministry to assess each filing according to its true content and identify what it reviewed, handled under another procedure, forwarded, or regarded as outside its powers. The action does not ask the administrative court to determine the correct THC method, review criminal judgments, declare innocence or dictate the outcome of an internal review.
Filing the action does not itself prove an unlawful intervention. Admissibility, evidence and the outcome are for the Prague Municipal Court. The related proceedings cited in the filing are 18 A 17/2026, 18 A 23/2026 and 8 Ad 9/2026.
Canonical source and evidence boundary
Open the complete Czech report and its linked source records →
This English edition reports the documented chronology and the author’s editorial interpretation separately. It is not legal advice and does not predict a court or authority’s decision.